Skip to content

It is difficult to identify Thai snakes

December 1, 2012

Of Chiang Mai’s 50+ snake species I have seen 13 at Dokmai Garden. Whenever I encounter a new snake, it takes quite an effort to make a proper identification. Although the number of snake species is conveniently limited, as compared with the estimated 2500 species of wild plants in the immediate neighbourhood, the short glimpse you get of a snake and the individual variation still keeps you in a cloud of mystery as to its identity and potential danger.

I certainly understand the 18th century explorers who shot and killed birds and snakes, at a time when there were hardly no books, no teachers, no bird call CD:s. You had to sit down and discover the morphological details, the basis for writing books and becoming an experienced naturalist.

Today the situation is different; walking next to an experienced field biologist will save you tremendous amounts of time. For birds and bird calls, I am grateful for my friendship with Tony Ball. For snakes, I treasure my friendship with Sjon Hauser. He has spent years studying road kills and living snakes to get a fair view of northern Thai species and their variation, also discovering new species. Hopefully he will summarize his vast knowledge in a book.

Below are two pictures of the same keelback species (Xenochrophis flavipunctatus) :

Xenochrophis flavipunctatus1.72

Of diagnostic value are the two ‘Pierrot tears’, hardly seen in any other northern Thai snake species. The black chevron behind its head is another important feature. Previously, this species was considered a colour variety of the chequered keelback (X. piscator), but that species is less chequered and has indistinct Pierrot tears and no chevron.

Xenochrophis flavipunctatus2.72

Believe it or not, this is the same species, caught in the same garden in Chiang Mai. This individual displays the black edges of the ventral scales, another distinctive characteristic. The yellow colour of the ventral scales is not specific and may be much paler. It should not be considered dangerous, but an interesting inhabitant of your monsoon garden.

An English name? It should have been ‘chequered keelback’ but that name is connected with the other original species. ‘Variable keelback’ would be a good name but is quite boring. Do you have any suggestions?

Text: Eric Danell

Identification: Sjon Hauser

Photo: Ronny Willman

Advertisements
5 Comments leave one →
  1. December 1, 2012 6:38 PM

    With great reluctance I offer – The Yellow-Spotted Keelback or Xenochrophis flavipunctatus – from Wiki. Let’s have the Thai name and I ask why Cox et al has no Thai names?

    • December 1, 2012 9:15 PM

      ‘Yellow-spotted’ is a direct translation from Latin, but not very descriptive either, but I guess that will do.

      I do not think there was a Thai name standard for snakes when Cox published his book, and Thais in general have very few specific names for snakes. The large edible ones have names, but nobody ever cared for the many smaller snakes. They are simply detested animals killed on the spot.

  2. December 2, 2012 10:25 AM

    Weeping keelback? It is descriptive and may create empathy with the vanishing wild flora and fauna.

    In spite of the legend of the noble Naga protecting Lord Buddha, and in spite the fact that all cobras I have seen in the wild mind their own business without aggressive behaviour, all snakes are feared. It is a primate instinct we need to acknowledge and overcome.

    • December 2, 2012 10:38 AM

      Overcome our instinct? I suggest not.
      Rather act like Brave Brave Sir Robin.
      Some years ago I was awandering on a west facing hill paying more attention to the beauty of the evening sky than the ground. Then of a sudden I looked down, perhaps a small sound had distracted me from my dreamy state. Before I had any time to think I emulated Sir Robin’s legendary behavior and in a flash “bravely turned and ran away”.
      No need to kill a snake , just follow one’s instinct.

  3. December 2, 2012 11:13 AM

    Please the note the source of the previous report lies here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4SJ0xR2_bQ

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: